Hi Andrew,
For meta replica work (HBASE-18070), we made some good progress. The
current estimate is that it needs one more week to commit patches.
Hope the schedule works for your 2.4 release schedule. If not, it will
be pushed to 2.5 release.
Thanks,
Huaxiang
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:32 AM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thank you, Critical seems more appropriate. As RM (assuming that's me now
> :-) ) I think it's fine to wait the estimated week for commit, then we can
> proceed.
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:51 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:00 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is it a blocker? Maybe mark it Critical? Either way, a week is well
> > within
> > > the timeframe discussed earlier. Will come back here to check progress
> at
> > > the end of next week. In the meantime it's fine to wait in my opinion.
> > >
> > >
> > Sorry. Critical yes, blocker no. My bad. Let me change priority.
> > S
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:55 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:58 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I do not think HBASE-18070 is a blocker for 2.4 as it is still on a
> > > > feature
> > > > > branch.
> > > > > And in the title of several jiras we have something like
> 'root/meta',
> > > > which
> > > > > seems to me that the intention is to also solve something related
> to
> > > > > splittable meta, then I do not think the work can be done in the
> near
> > > > > future...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > A few of us want it in 2.4. I've just made it a blocker (Hope that ok
> > > > Andrew). Should be done in the next week or so. Will shout if we run
> > into
> > > > obstacles (and we can punt on it then). We'd like to deploy the
> feature
> > > to
> > > > address hbase:meta issues we are seeing in production.
> > > >
> > > > What we're building should work for root if needed but will worry
> about
> > > > that when root shows up -- if it shows up.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > S
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2020年10月15日周四 上午1:53写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > To meet Nick's objective of a 2.4 release in November, we could
> > wait
> > > > two
> > > > > or
> > > > > > three weeks for the meta replica work to completely land. Will
> that
> > > be
> > > > > > sufficient?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:03 AM Huaxiang Sun <
> > huaxiang...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For meta replica work, the task jira is HBASE-18070
> > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18070>. The
> source
> > > side
> > > > > > > change
> > > > > > > has been committed, Endpoint change is under review.
> > > > > > > Meta Replica load balance support at client side is in
> progress.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Huaxiang
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Nick Dimiduk <
> > ndimi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you Andrew. I was of a similar mind -- if I'm doing
> 2.3,
> > > 2.4
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > only of minimal incremental overhead. It would probably
> > encourage
> > > > the
> > > > > > > early
> > > > > > > > retirement of 2.3 :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Does anyone else have outstanding work they're hoping to see
> in
> > > > 2.4?
> > > > > > I'd
> > > > > > > > love to see an initial RC posted in the first half of
> November.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:54 PM Andrew Purtell <
> > > apurt...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If nobody else wants to take this, I will.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Reid is co-RMing the pending 1.7 release with me. We've
> been
> > > > going
> > > > > > slow
> > > > > > > > > with it waiting for backports but can move forward with it
> > now
> > > > that
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > desired work has landed. I am not sensing any particular
> > > urgency
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > 1.x
> > > > > > > > > releasing. Anyway, doing 2.4 as well would be only
> > incremental
> > > > > > effort.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Nick Dimiduk <
> > > ndimi...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Bump.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We still need a volunteer for a release manager for 2.4.
> If
> > > we
> > > > > > delay
> > > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > > longer, we'll need another discussion, which is whether
> we
> > > > still
> > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > target the 6-month cadence on minor releases.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > In terms of outstanding work I'm hoping to see in 2.4,
> I'd
> > > like
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > number of these normalizer improvements in [0], or
> > determine
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > they're
> > > > > > > > > > not a problem. I think there's work on meta region
> replicas
> > > > > that's
> > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > targeting this release, but I don't have a JIRA handy.
> Are
> > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > other features folks are actively working on with 2.4 in
> > > mind?
> > > > > > Please
> > > > > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > > > in mind that there's really only about 4 weeks worth of
> dev
> > > > time
> > > > > > left
> > > > > > > > > > before we'll need a feature freeze for stabilizing and
> the
> > > > first
> > > > > > RC.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [0]:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Normalizer%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:36 AM Nick Dimiduk <
> > > > > ndimi...@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Heya!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Now that 2.3.x is in maintenance mode, I'd like to
> start
> > a
> > > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > 2.4. We've long agreed that a more frequent cadence of
> > > minor
> > > > > > > releases
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > superior to a long gap between them. I think we should
> > > > target a
> > > > > > > 2.4.0
> > > > > > > > > > > release sometime before the end of the calendar year,
> > > perhaps
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > weeks of December.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully the workload for the next release manager
> isn't
> > > as
> > > > > high
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > was for 2.3, given that much of the test stabilization
> > > effort
> > > > > > > > happened
> > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > branch-2. However, we are running in a new jenkins
> > > > environment,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > entropy
> > > > > > > > > > > is nothing if not persistent, which puts that hard-won
> > > > > stability
> > > > > > > back
> > > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > > doubt. Thus, I think it would be good if we can start
> > > sooner
> > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > later.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer to run the 2.4 release
> > line?
> > > > The
> > > > > > > level
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > effort is admittedly non-negligible: (1) stabilize
> > branch-2
> > > > (2)
> > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > > > > new-for-branch-2 features (3) run initial release (4)
> cut
> > > > > monthly
> > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > > releases until 2.5 is out. I have a strong interest in
> > > seeing
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > through, so I volunteer to assist with these
> activities.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn
> > from
> > > > > > truth's
> > > > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> > > truth's
> > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew
> > >
> > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > > decrepit hands
> > > - A23, Crosstalk
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
> - A23, Crosstalk
>
