That's fine, but after one more week let's roll the RC.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:52 PM Huaxiang Sun <huaxiang...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
>     For meta replica work (HBASE-18070), we made some good progress. The
> current estimate is that it needs one more week to commit patches.
>     Hope the schedule works for your 2.4 release schedule. If not, it will
> be pushed to 2.5 release.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Huaxiang
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:32 AM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Critical seems more appropriate. As RM (assuming that's me now
> > :-) ) I think it's fine to wait the estimated week for commit, then we
> can
> > proceed.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 2:51 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:00 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it a blocker? Maybe mark it Critical? Either way, a week is well
> > > within
> > > > the timeframe discussed earlier. Will come back here to check
> progress
> > at
> > > > the end of next week. In the meantime it's fine to wait in my
> opinion.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Sorry. Critical yes, blocker no. My bad. Let me change priority.
> > > S
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:55 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:58 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> palomino...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I do not think HBASE-18070 is a blocker for 2.4 as it is still
> on a
> > > > > feature
> > > > > > branch.
> > > > > > And in the title of several jiras we have something like
> > 'root/meta',
> > > > > which
> > > > > > seems to me that the intention is to also solve something related
> > to
> > > > > > splittable meta, then I do not think the work can be done in the
> > near
> > > > > > future...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > A few of us want it in 2.4. I've just made it a blocker (Hope that
> ok
> > > > > Andrew). Should be done in the next week or so. Will shout if we
> run
> > > into
> > > > > obstacles (and we can punt on it then). We'd like to deploy the
> > feature
> > > > to
> > > > > address hbase:meta issues we are seeing in production.
> > > > >
> > > > > What we're building should work for root if needed but will worry
> > about
> > > > > that when root shows up -- if it shows up.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > S
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2020年10月15日周四 上午1:53写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > To meet Nick's objective of a 2.4 release in November, we could
> > > wait
> > > > > two
> > > > > > or
> > > > > > > three weeks for the meta replica work to completely land. Will
> > that
> > > > be
> > > > > > > sufficient?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:03 AM Huaxiang Sun <
> > > huaxiang...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For meta replica work, the task jira is HBASE-18070
> > > > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18070>. The
> > source
> > > > side
> > > > > > > > change
> > > > > > > > has been committed, Endpoint change is under review.
> > > > > > > > Meta Replica load balance support at client side is in
> > progress.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Huaxiang
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Nick Dimiduk <
> > > ndimi...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you Andrew. I was of a similar mind -- if I'm doing
> > 2.3,
> > > > 2.4
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > only of minimal incremental overhead. It would probably
> > > encourage
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > early
> > > > > > > > > retirement of 2.3 :)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Does anyone else have outstanding work they're hoping to
> see
> > in
> > > > > 2.4?
> > > > > > > I'd
> > > > > > > > > love to see an initial RC posted in the first half of
> > November.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:54 PM Andrew Purtell <
> > > > apurt...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If nobody else wants to take this, I will.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Reid is co-RMing the pending 1.7 release with me. We've
> > been
> > > > > going
> > > > > > > slow
> > > > > > > > > > with it waiting for backports but can move forward with
> it
> > > now
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > desired work has landed. I am not sensing any particular
> > > > urgency
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > 1.x
> > > > > > > > > > releasing. Anyway, doing 2.4 as well would be only
> > > incremental
> > > > > > > effort.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Nick Dimiduk <
> > > > ndimi...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Bump.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We still need a volunteer for a release manager for
> 2.4.
> > If
> > > > we
> > > > > > > delay
> > > > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > > > longer, we'll need another discussion, which is whether
> > we
> > > > > still
> > > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > target the 6-month cadence on minor releases.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In terms of outstanding work I'm hoping to see in 2.4,
> > I'd
> > > > like
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > number of these normalizer improvements in [0], or
> > > determine
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > they're
> > > > > > > > > > > not a problem. I think there's work on meta region
> > replicas
> > > > > > that's
> > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > > targeting this release, but I don't have a JIRA handy.
> > Are
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > other features folks are actively working on with 2.4
> in
> > > > mind?
> > > > > > > Please
> > > > > > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > > > > in mind that there's really only about 4 weeks worth of
> > dev
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > left
> > > > > > > > > > > before we'll need a feature freeze for stabilizing and
> > the
> > > > > first
> > > > > > > RC.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [0]:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Normalizer%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:36 AM Nick Dimiduk <
> > > > > > ndimi...@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Heya!
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Now that 2.3.x is in maintenance mode, I'd like to
> > start
> > > a
> > > > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2.4. We've long agreed that a more frequent cadence
> of
> > > > minor
> > > > > > > > releases
> > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > superior to a long gap between them. I think we
> should
> > > > > target a
> > > > > > > > 2.4.0
> > > > > > > > > > > > release sometime before the end of the calendar year,
> > > > perhaps
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > weeks of December.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully the workload for the next release manager
> > isn't
> > > > as
> > > > > > high
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > was for 2.3, given that much of the test
> stabilization
> > > > effort
> > > > > > > > > happened
> > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > branch-2. However, we are running in a new jenkins
> > > > > environment,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > entropy
> > > > > > > > > > > > is nothing if not persistent, which puts that
> hard-won
> > > > > > stability
> > > > > > > > back
> > > > > > > > > > > into
> > > > > > > > > > > > doubt. Thus, I think it would be good if we can start
> > > > sooner
> > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > > later.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer to run the 2.4 release
> > > line?
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > level
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > effort is admittedly non-negligible: (1) stabilize
> > > branch-2
> > > > > (2)
> > > > > > > > test
> > > > > > > > > > > > new-for-branch-2 features (3) run initial release (4)
> > cut
> > > > > > monthly
> > > > > > > > > patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > releases until 2.5 is out. I have a strong interest
> in
> > > > seeing
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > > through, so I volunteer to assist with these
> > activities.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nick
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn
> > > from
> > > > > > > truth's
> > > > > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> > > > truth's
> > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> truth's
> > > > decrepit hands
> > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > decrepit hands
> >    - A23, Crosstalk
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew

Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
   - A23, Crosstalk

Reply via email to