> To meet Nick's objective of a 2.4 release in November To be clear, my objective is a 2.4.0 release that lands roughly 6 months after 2.3.0 landed, which was 13-07-2020. Given the extent of end-of-year holidays, and how little feature development work we expect at that time, I think it would be nice for 2.4.0 to land in early December. As I recall, we needed about 6 weeks of RCs to settle out 2.3.0, so I'm trying to account for a similar schedule for 2.4.0.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:00 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > Is it a blocker? Maybe mark it Critical? Either way, a week is well within > the timeframe discussed earlier. Will come back here to check progress at > the end of next week. In the meantime it's fine to wait in my opinion. > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:55 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:58 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I do not think HBASE-18070 is a blocker for 2.4 as it is still on a > > feature > > > branch. > > > And in the title of several jiras we have something like 'root/meta', > > which > > > seems to me that the intention is to also solve something related to > > > splittable meta, then I do not think the work can be done in the near > > > future... > > > > > > > > A few of us want it in 2.4. I've just made it a blocker (Hope that ok > > Andrew). Should be done in the next week or so. Will shout if we run into > > obstacles (and we can punt on it then). We'd like to deploy the feature > to > > address hbase:meta issues we are seeing in production. > > > > What we're building should work for root if needed but will worry about > > that when root shows up -- if it shows up. > > > > Thanks, > > S > > > > > > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2020年10月15日周四 上午1:53写道： > > > > > > > To meet Nick's objective of a 2.4 release in November, we could wait > > two > > > or > > > > three weeks for the meta replica work to completely land. Will that > be > > > > sufficient? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:03 AM Huaxiang Sun <huaxiang...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > For meta replica work, the task jira is HBASE-18070 > > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18070>. The source > side > > > > > change > > > > > has been committed, Endpoint change is under review. > > > > > Meta Replica load balance support at client side is in progress. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Huaxiang > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Andrew. I was of a similar mind -- if I'm doing 2.3, > 2.4 > > > > would > > > > > be > > > > > > only of minimal incremental overhead. It would probably encourage > > the > > > > > early > > > > > > retirement of 2.3 :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone else have outstanding work they're hoping to see in > > 2.4? > > > > I'd > > > > > > love to see an initial RC posted in the first half of November. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:54 PM Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nobody else wants to take this, I will. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reid is co-RMing the pending 1.7 release with me. We've been > > going > > > > slow > > > > > > > with it waiting for backports but can move forward with it now > > that > > > > the > > > > > > > desired work has landed. I am not sensing any particular > urgency > > > with > > > > > 1.x > > > > > > > releasing. Anyway, doing 2.4 as well would be only incremental > > > > effort. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Nick Dimiduk < > ndimi...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bump. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We still need a volunteer for a release manager for 2.4. If > we > > > > delay > > > > > > much > > > > > > > > longer, we'll need another discussion, which is whether we > > still > > > > want > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > target the 6-month cadence on minor releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In terms of outstanding work I'm hoping to see in 2.4, I'd > like > > > to > > > > > get > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > number of these normalizer improvements in [0], or determine > > that > > > > > > they're > > > > > > > > not a problem. I think there's work on meta region replicas > > > that's > > > > > also > > > > > > > > targeting this release, but I don't have a JIRA handy. Are > > there > > > > > > > > other features folks are actively working on with 2.4 in > mind? > > > > Please > > > > > > > keep > > > > > > > > in mind that there's really only about 4 weeks worth of dev > > time > > > > left > > > > > > > > before we'll need a feature freeze for stabilizing and the > > first > > > > RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Normalizer%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:36 AM Nick Dimiduk < > > > ndimi...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heya! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that 2.3.x is in maintenance mode, I'd like to start a > > > > > discussion > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > 2.4. We've long agreed that a more frequent cadence of > minor > > > > > releases > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > superior to a long gap between them. I think we should > > target a > > > > > 2.4.0 > > > > > > > > > release sometime before the end of the calendar year, > perhaps > > > the > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > > weeks of December. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully the workload for the next release manager isn't > as > > > high > > > > > as > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > was for 2.3, given that much of the test stabilization > effort > > > > > > happened > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > branch-2. However, we are running in a new jenkins > > environment, > > > > and > > > > > > > > entropy > > > > > > > > > is nothing if not persistent, which puts that hard-won > > > stability > > > > > back > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > > doubt. Thus, I think it would be good if we can start > sooner > > > than > > > > > > > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer to run the 2.4 release line? > > The > > > > > level > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > effort is admittedly non-negligible: (1) stabilize branch-2 > > (2) > > > > > test > > > > > > > > > new-for-branch-2 features (3) run initial release (4) cut > > > monthly > > > > > > patch > > > > > > > > > releases until 2.5 is out. I have a strong interest in > seeing > > > > this > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > through, so I volunteer to assist with these activities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > > > truth's > > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > truth's > > > > decrepit hands > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
