Is it a blocker? Maybe mark it Critical? Either way, a week is well within the timeframe discussed earlier. Will come back here to check progress at the end of next week. In the meantime it's fine to wait in my opinion.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:55 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 6:58 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I do not think HBASE-18070 is a blocker for 2.4 as it is still on a > feature > > branch. > > And in the title of several jiras we have something like 'root/meta', > which > > seems to me that the intention is to also solve something related to > > splittable meta, then I do not think the work can be done in the near > > future... > > > > > A few of us want it in 2.4. I've just made it a blocker (Hope that ok > Andrew). Should be done in the next week or so. Will shout if we run into > obstacles (and we can punt on it then). We'd like to deploy the feature to > address hbase:meta issues we are seeing in production. > > What we're building should work for root if needed but will worry about > that when root shows up -- if it shows up. > > Thanks, > S > > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2020年10月15日周四 上午1:53写道： > > > > > To meet Nick's objective of a 2.4 release in November, we could wait > two > > or > > > three weeks for the meta replica work to completely land. Will that be > > > sufficient? > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 10:03 AM Huaxiang Sun <huaxiang...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > For meta replica work, the task jira is HBASE-18070 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18070>. The source side > > > > change > > > > has been committed, Endpoint change is under review. > > > > Meta Replica load balance support at client side is in progress. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Huaxiang > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thank you Andrew. I was of a similar mind -- if I'm doing 2.3, 2.4 > > > would > > > > be > > > > > only of minimal incremental overhead. It would probably encourage > the > > > > early > > > > > retirement of 2.3 :) > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone else have outstanding work they're hoping to see in > 2.4? > > > I'd > > > > > love to see an initial RC posted in the first half of November. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:54 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > If nobody else wants to take this, I will. > > > > > > > > > > > > Reid is co-RMing the pending 1.7 release with me. We've been > going > > > slow > > > > > > with it waiting for backports but can move forward with it now > that > > > the > > > > > > desired work has landed. I am not sensing any particular urgency > > with > > > > 1.x > > > > > > releasing. Anyway, doing 2.4 as well would be only incremental > > > effort. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:38 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bump. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We still need a volunteer for a release manager for 2.4. If we > > > delay > > > > > much > > > > > > > longer, we'll need another discussion, which is whether we > still > > > want > > > > > to > > > > > > > target the 6-month cadence on minor releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In terms of outstanding work I'm hoping to see in 2.4, I'd like > > to > > > > get > > > > > a > > > > > > > number of these normalizer improvements in [0], or determine > that > > > > > they're > > > > > > > not a problem. I think there's work on meta region replicas > > that's > > > > also > > > > > > > targeting this release, but I don't have a JIRA handy. Are > there > > > > > > > other features folks are actively working on with 2.4 in mind? > > > Please > > > > > > keep > > > > > > > in mind that there's really only about 4 weeks worth of dev > time > > > left > > > > > > > before we'll need a feature freeze for stabilizing and the > first > > > RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Normalizer%20ORDER%20BY%20issuetype%20DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:36 AM Nick Dimiduk < > > ndimi...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heya! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that 2.3.x is in maintenance mode, I'd like to start a > > > > discussion > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > 2.4. We've long agreed that a more frequent cadence of minor > > > > releases > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > superior to a long gap between them. I think we should > target a > > > > 2.4.0 > > > > > > > > release sometime before the end of the calendar year, perhaps > > the > > > > > first > > > > > > > > weeks of December. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully the workload for the next release manager isn't as > > high > > > > as > > > > > it > > > > > > > > was for 2.3, given that much of the test stabilization effort > > > > > happened > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > branch-2. However, we are running in a new jenkins > environment, > > > and > > > > > > > entropy > > > > > > > > is nothing if not persistent, which puts that hard-won > > stability > > > > back > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > doubt. Thus, I think it would be good if we can start sooner > > than > > > > > > later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer to run the 2.4 release line? > The > > > > level > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > effort is admittedly non-negligible: (1) stabilize branch-2 > (2) > > > > test > > > > > > > > new-for-branch-2 features (3) run initial release (4) cut > > monthly > > > > > patch > > > > > > > > releases until 2.5 is out. I have a strong interest in seeing > > > this > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > through, so I volunteer to assist with these activities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from > > > truth's > > > > > > decrepit hands > > > > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > > > decrepit hands > > > - A23, Crosstalk > > > > > > -- Best regards, Andrew Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's decrepit hands - A23, Crosstalk
