On nightly jdk11 build the jdk version is

AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.6+10

Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> 于2020年12月10日周四 上午7:21写道:

> Let me rephrase.
>
> I'm all for testing the optional configurations. I'm less supportive of
> vetoing releases when an optional configuration has some issue due to a
> third party component. I would like to see us veto only on the required
> configurations, and otherwise file JIRAs to fix up the nits on the optional
> ones.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:19 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > > parseJDK9:71, JavaVersion (org.eclipse.jetty.util)
> >
> > So unless I am mistaken, some Jetty utility class is not able to parse
> the
> > version string of your particular JDK/JRE.
> >
> > We can try to downgrade Jetty but I am not sure in general how we are
> > supposed to take on the risk of third party dependencies doing the wrong
> > thing in an optional configuration. I for one do not want to deal with a
> > combinatorial explosion of transitive dependencies when releasing.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:41 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> This is coming out of Jetty + Hadoop. This build has a regression in our
> >> JDK11 support. Or perhaps there's a regression in the upstream Hadoop
> >> against which JDK11 builds.
> >>
> >> I'm afraid I must vote -1 until we can sort out the issue. I'd
> appreciate
> >> it if someone else can attempt to repro, help ensure it's not just me.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Nick
> >>
> >> (Apologies for the crude stack trace; this is copied out of an attached
> >> debugger)
> >>
> >> parseJDK9:71, JavaVersion (org.eclipse.jetty.util)
> >> parse:49, JavaVersion (org.eclipse.jetty.util)
> >> <clinit>:43, JavaVersion (org.eclipse.jetty.util)
> >> findAndFilterContainerPaths:185, WebInfConfiguration
> >> (org.eclipse.jetty.webapp)
> >> preConfigure:155, WebInfConfiguration (org.eclipse.jetty.webapp)
> >> preConfigure:485, WebAppContext (org.eclipse.jetty.webapp)
> >> doStart:521, WebAppContext (org.eclipse.jetty.webapp)
> >> start:68, AbstractLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> start:131, ContainerLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> doStart:113, ContainerLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> doStart:61, AbstractHandler (org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler)
> >> start:68, AbstractLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> start:131, ContainerLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> start:427, Server (org.eclipse.jetty.server)
> >> doStart:105, ContainerLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> doStart:61, AbstractHandler (org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler)
> >> doStart:394, Server (org.eclipse.jetty.server)
> >> start:68, AbstractLifeCycle (org.eclipse.jetty.util.component)
> >> start:1140, HttpServer2 (org.apache.hadoop.http)
> >> start:177, NameNodeHttpServer (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode)
> >> startHttpServer:872, NameNode (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode)
> >> initialize:694, NameNode (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode)
> >> <init>:940, NameNode (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode)
> >> <init>:913, NameNode (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode)
> >> createNameNode:1646, NameNode (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode)
> >> createNameNode:1314, MiniDFSCluster (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs)
> >> configureNameService:1083, MiniDFSCluster (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs)
> >> createNameNodesAndSetConf:958, MiniDFSCluster (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs)
> >> initMiniDFSCluster:890, MiniDFSCluster (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs)
> >> <init>:518, MiniDFSCluster (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs)
> >> build:477, MiniDFSCluster$Builder (org.apache.hadoop.hdfs)
> >> startMiniDFSCluster:108, AsyncFSTestBase
> >> (org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.asyncfs)
> >> setUp:87, TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput
> >> (org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.asyncfs)
> >> invoke0:-1, NativeMethodAccessorImpl (jdk.internal.reflect)
> >> invoke:62, NativeMethodAccessorImpl (jdk.internal.reflect)
> >> invoke:43, DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl (jdk.internal.reflect)
> >> invoke:566, Method (java.lang.reflect)
> >> runReflectiveCall:59, FrameworkMethod$1 (org.junit.runners.model)
> >> run:12, ReflectiveCallable (org.junit.internal.runners.model)
> >> invokeExplosively:56, FrameworkMethod (org.junit.runners.model)
> >> invokeMethod:33, RunBefores (org.junit.internal.runners.statements)
> >> evaluate:24, RunBefores (org.junit.internal.runners.statements)
> >> evaluate:27, RunAfters (org.junit.internal.runners.statements)
> >> evaluate:38, SystemExitRule$1 (org.apache.hadoop.hbase)
> >> call:288, FailOnTimeout$CallableStatement
> >> (org.junit.internal.runners.statements)
> >> call:282, FailOnTimeout$CallableStatement
> >> (org.junit.internal.runners.statements)
> >> run:264, FutureTask (java.util.concurrent)
> >> run:834, Thread (java.lang)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:08 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:51 PM Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Has anyone successfully built/run this RC with JDK11 and Hadoop3
> >> profile?
> >> >> I'm seeing test failures locally in the hbase-asyncfs module.
> >> >> Reproducible with:
> >> >>
> >> >> $
> >> >>
> >>
> JAVA_HOME=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home
> >> >> mvn clean install -Dhadoop.profile=3.0
> >> >>
> >>
> -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.asyncfs.TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput
> >> >> ...
> >> >> [INFO] Running
> >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.asyncfs.TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
> >> >> 1.785 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.asyncfs.TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput
> >> >>
> >> >> [ERROR]
> >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.asyncfs.TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput
> >> Time
> >> >> elapsed: 1.775 s  <<< ERROR!
> >> >>
> >> >> java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>         at
> >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io
> >>
> .asyncfs.TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput.setUp(TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput.java:87)
> >> >>
> >> >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Java version
> >> >> 11.0.9.1
> >> >>
> >> >>         at
> >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io
> >>
> .asyncfs.TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput.setUp(TestFanOutOneBlockAsyncDFSOutput.java:87)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > This failure is not isolated to macOS. I ran this build on an Ubuntu
> VM
> >> > with the same AdoptOpenJDK 11.0.9.1. Why don't we see this in Jenkins?
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
> >> > 0.011 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestAsyncProtobufLog
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestAsyncProtobufLog
> >> >  Time elapsed: 0.003 s  <<< ERROR!
> >> >
> >> > java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
> >> >
> >> >         at
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestAsyncProtobufLog.setUpBeforeClass(TestAsyncProtobufLog.java:56)
> >> >
> >> >         Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Java
> >> version
> >> > 11.0.9.1
> >> >         at
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestAsyncProtobufLog.setUpBeforeClass(TestAsyncProtobufLog.java:56)
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:05 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Please vote on this Apache hbase release candidate, hbase-2.4.0RC1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache hbase 2.4.0
> >> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The tag to be voted on is 2.4.0RC1:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     https://github.com/apache/hbase/tree/2.4.0RC1
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as
> >> CHANGES.md
> >> >>> and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.4.0RC1/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Customarily Maven artifacts would be available in a staging
> >> repository.
> >> >>> Unfortunately I was forced to terminate the Maven deploy step after
> >> >>> the upload ran for more than four hours and my build equipment
> >> >>> needed to be relocated, with loss of network connectivity. This RC
> has
> >> >>> been delayed long enough. A temporary Maven repository is not a
> >> >>> requirement for a vote. I will retry Maven deploy tomorrow. I can
> >> >>> promise the artifacts for this RC will be staged in Apache Nexus and
> >> >>> ready for release well ahead of the earliest possible time this vote
> >> >>> can complete.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Artifacts were signed with the apurt...@apache.org key which can be
> >> >>> found
> >> >>> in:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The API compatibility report for this RC can be found at:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/2.4.0RC1/api_compare_2.4.0RC1_to_2.3.0.html
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The changes are mostly added methods, which conform to the
> >> compatibility
> >> >>> guidelines for a new minor release. There is one change to the
> public
> >> >>> Region interface that alters the return type of a method. This is
> >> >>> equivalent to a removal then addition and can be a binary
> >> compatibility
> >> >>> problem. However to your RM's eye the change looks intentional and
> is
> >> >>> part of an API improvement project, and a compatibility method is
> not
> >> >>> possible here because Java doesn't consider return type when
> deciding
> >> if
> >> >>> one method signature duplicates another.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> To learn more about Apache HBase, please see
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     http://hbase.apache.org/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> Your HBase Release Manager
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> > decrepit hands
> >    - A23, Crosstalk
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
>    - A23, Crosstalk
>

Reply via email to