On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 16:18 +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2017-05-10 um 09:59 schrieb Oleg Kalnichevski: > > > > I collected all your latest SVN commits and pushed them to the Git > > repo. Nothing should have been lost. > > > > One personal request. Do you think you could try to make your > > commits > > less granular and combine logically related changes into larger > > change > > sets? > > > > You have committed 6 changes, all of them related, and all of them > > pretty much one liners. Now that we have Git I am very, very > > tempted to > > start squashing your commits and force pushing the changes back to > > the > > repo. > > We should talk about this in a separate thread. With Git comes more > disciple but also a better way to make your own work cleaner avoiding > 10 > cleanup commits. > >
Hi Michael Yes, please do feel free to start a new thread on Git etiquette, common practices, policies and so on. We can discuss whether or not we want to keep trunk as an unstable dev branch or rename it to 5.0.x or master. I am personally interested in finding a consensus if it is OK to re- write branches, for instance, by squashing noisy commits and style check fixes. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
