On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Xuefu Zhang <xzh...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi Thejas/Alan,
>
> From all the argument, I think there was an assumption that the proposed
> 1.0 release will be imminent and 0.15 will happen far after that. Based on
> that assumption, 0.15 will become 1.1, which is greater in scope than 1.0.
> However, this assumption may not be true. The confusion will be significant
> if 0.15 is released early as 0.15 before 0.14.1 is released as 1.0.

Yes, the assumption is that 1.0 will be out very soon,  before 0.15
line is ready, and that 0.15 can become 1.1 .
Do you think that assumption won't hold true ? (In previous emails in
this thread, I talk about reasons why this assumption is reliable).
I agree that it does not make sense to release 1.0 as proposed in this
thread if that does not hold true.

> Another concern is that, the proposed release of 1.0 is a subset of of
> Hive's functionality, and for major releases users are expecting major
> improvement in functionality as well as stability. Mutating from 0.14.1
> release seems falling short in that expectation.

Every release of hive has been a subset of tip of the trunk (we branch
for release while trunk moves ahead), and super set of changes of
every previous release. So every release so far has had a subset of
functionality of hive trunk branch (if that is what you are referring
to).
With the 1.0 proposed based on 0.14 maintenance branch, this still
holds true. (Again, this is with the assumption you called out about
about timeline of 1.0 and 0.15).

-- 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, 
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or 
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately 
and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to