On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we do a 1.0.0 release there is no problem with us later releasing 14.1 > or a 14.2. I think everyone would understand that the 14.2 being released > after 1.0.0 would likely have back ported features. Releasing a 15.0 after > 1.0 would not make as much sense as we probably do not want two active > branches. >
I assume you inadvertently missed the "0." before 14 and 15. I think everybody agrees that releasing a 0.15 which is a super set of changes of 1.0 would be a bad idea, and it 0.15 should become 1.1 . 1.0 branch would be used to release any further maintenance fixes if necessary (eg 1.0.x) (ie it is a 1.0.x release branch and not a 1.x.x branch) > I understand why this happens but I think it is a bit hokie. Would anyone > be happy if hive depended on > "git-edwardcapriolo-coolutils-0.0.0-snapshot-5". So if we are having the > "serious 1.0 talk" we should avoid things like this. I agree we should not have releases depending on snapshots. This is no longer an issue in 0.14 branch. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
