-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Agree, but we should not forget the few faithfuls out there ;) And there has been interest out there for a 1.2 from quite a few ...
Would an option be to trickle out a 1.2 release while putting more effort into re-defining Hivemind's reasons for not dying? Cheers, Johan Raffael Herzog wrote: | Am Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008 15.04:43 schrieb James Carman: |> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:57 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |>> James - do you think that there is any chance that there will be any |>> work on Hivemind in the future? Or is it really at its end? |> I really don't know at this point. Spring is very pervasive and even |> Howard stopped using HiveMind on Tapestry (our biggest source of |> customers by far) in version 5. I actually use Spring myself now. | | I think, this is exactly HiveMind's problem: In that moment, when Tapestry | stopped using HiveMind, HiveMind basically lost it's reason of existence. | There are now two options: | a) we let it die | b) we give it a new reason of existence | | This might also include throwing away some existing efforts for 1.2 or 2.0, | no replacement planned. *might*, not *must*! | | I think, if we want to get HiveMind back to life, we should be open to take | some drastic measures. | Cheers, | Raffi | - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIKoo7pHYnED7evioRAvBZAJ9pjVi9QlY4aCMxJ/EJhJTN0TlcogCfa5GA KjC6ikFkEZTOFQOvdDU2dJQ= =FjoQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
