> > --- perchild.c 2001/11/10 18:26:29 1.82 > > +++ perchild.c 2001/11/12 23:49:07 1.83 > > @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ > > ap_sock_disable_nagle(sock); > > } > > > > - current_conn = ap_new_connection(p, ap_server_conf, sock, > > conn_id); + current_conn = ap_run_create_connection(p, ap_server_conf, > > sock, conn_id); > > There is an extra parameter there, but I think it should stay and the rest > should change :-)
I'm getting to the rest of the comments in this e-mail slowly, but I did the above. I could go either way, so rather than argue, I just did it. :-) > Otherwise... a good move. Can we toss the pre_connection stuff? Which pre_connection stuff? All of it, like that entire hook. Probably. Doing that work after the accept makes more sense in my mind. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
