> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 02:31:49PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > I've spent some time on this and this is one reason I am sort of interested in a >proxy > > specific input filter. I agree with Ryan that 99.9% would be identical to what is already > > in HTTP_IN now. > > Then, why have a separate input filter just for proxy? IIRC, proxy > could use some work to play nicer with filters, but I don't think > we need to duplicate the code. My $.02. Either we do checks like > you added or split it out (which I don't think is worth doing just > for limits). -- justin >
I voted with a commit :-) I agree with you on all points. Just a little nervous about other filters being inserted into the input stream that frob stuff in the request_rec that is not initialized by ap_proxy_make_fake_req(). In practice, it is probably not a problem though. Bill
