On Thursday 03 January 2002 11:31 am, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > The real question > > is what is the request actually using within this dummy configuration, and that > > would require some single stepping I don't have time for this week. > > > I've spent some time on this and this is one reason I am sort of interested in a >proxy > specific input filter. I agree with Ryan that 99.9% would be identical to what is >already > in HTTP_IN now.
If it is going to be 99.9% identical than it should be the same function. Having identical code in two places is asking for trouble. We have done a great job removing duplicate code from the server in 2.0, please let's not put more in now. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
