From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:59 PM
> > wrowe 02/02/04 10:51:59 > > > > Modified: . STATUS > > Log: > > Brrr... it's frigid in Chicago today! Hope FirstBill doesn't mind if > > I speak for us both here. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.453 +7 -5 httpd-2.0/STATUS > > > > + > > + * FirstBill reports problem [re]starting as-a-service, shared > > + score is suspect. OtherBill is investigating, definately > > + a showstopper for a .31/.32 beta. Progress report later today. > > This is a BETA, it is not perfect. The biggest benefit we get from > releasing a beta is _Beta Testers_. It seems to me that we are *very* > close to GA, but I will not be in support of a gold release without > significantly more beta visibility and testing than we've had. Aaron, it doesn't even friggin work [for the usual Win32 application] :) > This particular problem aparently has a workaround: Don't run it as a > service on win32. That's not an acceptable workaround - we need the BETA to test the robustness of the service. > Although it looks like we have a comfortable majority in favor of > releasing this as a beta, I'd feel better if there were no -1 votes. Can > I pursuade you to change your mind for the above reasons? Ahmmm... no, and your vote is invalid at the moment; I'm certain if you give folks 8 hours to comment; some will agree this is a showstopper. However, I expect to have this fixed and tested tonight - we should be able to move on from here fairly quickly. Critical faults include; 1. failure to log to the WinNT system event log. 2. failure to recognize the usual DocRoot/ServerRoot. It doesn't seem like we have any score problem, but I haven't gotten that far yet... Bill
