Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > rbb 02/04/05 09:50:37 > > > > > > Modified: modules/generators mod_autoindex.c > > > Log: > > > This is a HACK! > > > > Why would it be difficult for the core to preserve OLD_WRITE in the > subreq > > filter chain? We knew how to do that in 2.0.32. One would hope we > get > > smarter > > as we get more experienced. > > Because in pre-2.0.32 code, fast_internal_redirects didn't remove all of > the RESOURCE filters. It does now, because that is the correct thing to > do. The problem is that there is one RESOURCE filters that we want to > keep, OLD_WRITE.
OK, so maybe we proved that OLD_WRITE isn't an ordinary RESOURCE filter. Calling it something else might do the trick. Greg
