> Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > rbb 02/04/05 09:50:37 > > > > > > > > Modified: modules/generators mod_autoindex.c > > > > Log: > > > > This is a HACK! > > > > > > Why would it be difficult for the core to preserve OLD_WRITE in the > > subreq > > > filter chain? We knew how to do that in 2.0.32. One would hope we > > get > > > smarter > > > as we get more experienced. > > > > Because in pre-2.0.32 code, fast_internal_redirects didn't remove all of > > the RESOURCE filters. It does now, because that is the correct thing to > > do. The problem is that there is one RESOURCE filters that we want to > > keep, OLD_WRITE. > > OK, so maybe we proved that OLD_WRITE isn't an ordinary RESOURCE filter. > Calling it something else might do the trick.
The problem is that it MUST be a RESOURCE filter, or it will be put in the wrong location in the filter stack. Ryan
