* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Most likely Nov 2002. > > > > Doesn't help out now, I know. > > > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:25:39PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > Hopefully, the next ApacheCon will afford an op for mega signing :) > > > > > > *ahem* When will the next ApacheCon be? -- justin > > > > > Although one day we should make this part of the commiter initiation > procedure - fill your your key ID on the committer consent form :-) > getting Debian "commit" (it's a slightly different idea, but close enough) status is even more stringent - you have to have your key signed in person by someone else with commit status... -Thom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEYS Aaron Bannert
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEYS Brad Nicholes
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEYS Cliff Woolley
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEYS Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEYS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEYS Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-dist KEY... dirkx
- ApacheCon scheduling was R... Thom May
- ApacheCon scheduling was Re: c... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: ApacheCon scheduling Sander van Zoest
- Re: ApacheCon scheduling Jim Jagielski
- Re: ApacheCon scheduling w... Cliff Woolley
- RE: ApacheCon scheduling w... Sander Striker
- Re: ApacheCon scheduling w... Pier Fumagalli
- httpd-2.0 policies was Re:... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: httpd-2.0 policies was... Pier Fumagalli
- RE: httpd-2.0 policies was... Ryan Bloom
- Re: httpd-2.0 policies was... Justin Erenkrantz
