[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In the message above, I don't > think you are advocating a 2.1 branch. It sounds like you believe that > we should take the time to finish 2.0 before moving on. Am I right in > interpreting it that way? >
+++1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
