Geoffrey Young wrote: > > so, can someone comment on what 2.2 (and the subsequent 2.3) mean for 2.0? > that is, if everyday hacking is against 2.3 and we propose a new feature to > backport, do we backport to both 2.2 and 2.0? or does it mean that 2.0 has > reached end-of-life and we backport only to 2.2? > > just so I (and others) know what to expect... :) >
I would foresee only 1.3 and 2.2 being around and 2.0 being EOLed. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
