At 03:15 PM 8/12/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: >Geoffrey Young wrote: >> >> so, can someone comment on what 2.2 (and the subsequent 2.3) mean for 2.0? >> that is, if everyday hacking is against 2.3 and we propose a new feature to >> backport, do we backport to both 2.2 and 2.0? or does it mean that 2.0 has >> reached end-of-life and we backport only to 2.2? >> >> just so I (and others) know what to expect... :) > >I would foresee only 1.3 and 2.2 being around and 2.0 being EOLed.
I expect the same, although providing the occasional 2.0 release for security bug fixes. Bill
