On Monday 24 October 2005 13:22, Joe Orton wrote: > There was a thread about this previously; just checking for consensus, > is there any objection to bumping the apr/apr-util version requirements > to 1.2.x? (1.2.x is already required for mod_dbd, event MP, and it will > simplify the code to allow unconditional use of 1.2.x features)
+1 Indeed, given not least the close relationship of the projects, I see no real downside in requiring APR to be latest-at-time-of-2.2-release, whether that be 1.2 or some later version. -- Nick Kew
