Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > +1. Just one thought: I think it would be useful to have this 'health check' > approach somewhat generic so that we can implement the call to it inside > mod_proxy > and its connection pooling itself (e.g. with providers supplied by schema > handlers / modules). For AJP this would be CPING/CPONG of course and > mod_proxy itself could offer a generic TCP connection 'health check' > provider that simply > checks the status of a TCP connection as far as this is possible without > reading or writing data. This would be a very generic provider. Other > protocol > handlers could define other (better) protocol specific providers and > just plug them in. >
Agreed. Making a generic hearbeat interface that could vary depending on the actual protocol would be v. cool. So for AJP, CPING/CPONG, for HTTP some sort of generic TRACE (or HEAD)... -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
