I didn't read this very carefully.
On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 18:26 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I'm sure they can. This doesn't make them the right solution for all
> cases.
>
> In a multi tier architecture, you already have front end servers
> implementing URL strategies, common logging, all sorts of other
> things.
>
> Adding an extra router layer to handle load balancing, when your
> already
<snip>
This seems reasonable. Given paragraph 2 ("URL strategies etc") Not for
the reasons I've omitted (and responded to separately). However, I
still don't think this will scale the way router-based solutions can
(already :-).
--
--gh
