On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 18:31 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > I get the sense that you would rather the developers scratch your itch
Their itch is not a problem for me ... and it isn't something I would necessarily use apache for ... though for a small to medium scale setup it might be very useful. > (in > the form of perchild), rather than theirs (in the form of lb). Absolutely :-). I have no intention of writing any code for perchild if someone else (undoubtedly far more qualified than I) happens to want to do it. After looking at the code from subversion and having thought a little more about 'perchild' I can see a few difficulties and I can see good reasons why it may not have been worked on. The reason I am interested in perchild is that combined with WebDav and Reiser4 it will be possible to create general business applications which make subversion look like a toy. Perchild looks like the missing piece. It is extremely inconvenient for everything on the back-end to be owned by one user. The client-side support for WebDav has been present in windows since 1998. For some reason, Microsoft just seems to have stopped there. -- --gh
