Jorge Schrauwen wrote: >> >> One major issue is; >> >> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/459847/100/0/threaded >> >> where MS's response was entirely unsatisfactory w.r.t. POSIX compliance. >> > Does MS ever follow standards? I know most programs don't compile in > 64-bit while there is no obvious reason it shouldn't. USE_32BIT_TIME_T > usually fixes that... that link you gave me seems to explain why :)
Of course we toggle that for 32 bit builds; trouble is - for a 64 bit build we really don't want to use a tiny-time_t, true? But maybe that is the answer, for now :-/ > Are there any others that convalent? I don't mind linking to just one > but it would seem unfair to just provided one when there are possibly > more. Agreed; is anyone aware of other commercial companies offering supported Apache httpd Win32 packages? Bill
