You know, I often think of offering this from my own consulting company; but I often wonder what exactly it entails... It worries me that I'd be inviting myself to get sued for a bug that already e4xists in Apache, whether or not I'm able to get it subsequently fit. Would it be asking too much for you to put on your Covalent hat for a moment, pretend that I'm a prospective client and tell me what Covalent would and would not commit to support/warranty wise? Or am I being way to presumptuous by asking?
Issac William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Nick Kew wrote: > > I think you lost the context; we are trying to point out where one > can find 'commercial warranties' - we weren't focused on where you > can get more unsupported binaries. E.g. there's an AL clause that > says 'NO WARRANTY' and Jorge is worried about people who just read > past that and later come back to him. It's one small slice of the > community which 'needs a warranty' that he was trying to address. > > Bill >
