Jim Jagielski wrote: > Just a FYI: I'm planning on doing a T&R of 2.0.61 tomorrow (Aug 13); > It's a retag of 2.0.60 (plus the version bump, 'natch), and a reroll > with the singular exception of bundling APR 0.9.12, instead of 0.9.14.
Just a quick note; I'll definitely find that objectionable. Particularly from 0.9.13 *) Provide folding in autogenerated .manifest files for Win32 builders which provided our Windows users the ability to use the "Free" Studio 2005 to build their own Apache. I'm always happy to help ensure we have binaries, but not at the expense of encouraging users to "roll their own". Also *) Fix detection of pthread cross-process robust mutexes. would also likely impact us negatively on some platforms with respect to ssl cache and accept mutexes, no? So I can hazard a guess that I'd be -1 on such a tarball. Bill
