William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Sander Temme wrote: > > > > On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > >> It is mostly the same people, regardless. Bill could tag 0.9.15 > >> and start a release vote on APR while Jim rebuilds 2.0.x based > >> on that tag and starts another release vote here. That way, lazy > >> folks like me can test both at once. > > I'm rolling APR snaps no later than first thing Wed a.m. > > No issue if Jim combines an apr release candidate with an httpd > candidate, as long as everyone is ok that if apr goes boom, httpd > would need to be rerolled. > > This is pretty stable code, so I'm not worried. > > With the Darwin fixes, I'd almost like to see 2.2.6 rerolled, with > no change to httpd. Does anyone else find an objection to that? > Jim, would it inflict too much pain to do this wed/thus? >
I've no problem with 2.0 and 2.2 being re-tagged and re-rolled to incorporate the latest APR fixes... Wed/Thurs is fine with me :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
