Re: AP_CONN_CLOSE on force-response-1.0

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> I might be confused here, but if the response is forced 1.0,
> then there are no keepalives in which case we want to *force*
> keepalives off.

Actually two different settings, no?  1.0 supported explicit keepalives.