Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2007, at 12:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> I might be confused here, but if the response is forced 1.0, >>> then there are no keepalives in which case we want to *force* >>> keepalives off. >> >> Actually two different settings, no? 1.0 supported explicit keepalives. >> > > But the force disabling is the main intent of the implementation, iirc. > ie: they didn't behave right with Connection: Keep-Alive
isn't there a connection-close variable trigger that should be used to enforce that?
