Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On Oct 9, 2007, at 12:40 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> I might be confused here, but if the response is forced 1.0,
>>> then there are no keepalives in which case we want to *force*
>>> keepalives off.
>>
>> Actually two different settings, no?  1.0 supported explicit keepalives.
>>
> 
> But the force disabling is the main intent of the implementation, iirc.
> ie: they didn't behave right with Connection: Keep-Alive

isn't there a connection-close variable trigger that should be used
to enforce that?

Reply via email to