On 01/02/2008 08:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > FWIW, STATUS on the 2.x branches is cleaned up in anticipation > of the T&R (there are no open patches for 1.3, afaik).
FWIW, the reason that caused Nick to veto on 2.2.x is still there on 2.0.x, so I guess it would be good if you could give it the missing vote and backport it. > > If you haven't already, I encourage everyone to 'svn up' and > at least run some prelim tests before I do the actual T&R. > I've been working on getting my old Blade (Sol8) up and > running (something's happened to it since I last booted > it up) and test there (as well as on OS X and SUSE) before > I tag. So it would be useful to get some prelim feedback that > we are ready for a tag if others can test. > First results for SuSE 10.2: 2.2.x: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/ssl/pr43738.t 4 2 50.00% 2 4 7 tests and 18 subtests skipped. Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 2/2841 subtests failed, 99.93% okay. But this is no regression. 2.0.x Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/ssl/pr43738.t 4 2 50.00% 2 4 (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 15 tests and 25 subtests skipped. Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 2/2816 subtests failed, 99.93% okay. But this is no regression. I try to get some more results in the next hour so stay tuned. Regards Rüdiger
