Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yes, I saw that, but I wanted to dig deeper and read his Email on why he didn't like it...
Well, he wanted a patch for a narrowly defined mod_proxy_ftp-specific directive context, but offered a patch to apply a server_rec, while Rudiger's patch is against the dir_rec which is much more appropriate. AIUI he questioned the need to change the general mod_proxy directive configuration structures for a mod_proxy_ftp specific directive. That said, I don't see the issue, think it could be useful to other proxy intermediaries, so let's just go with Rudiger's. Bill