On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:56:23 -0500 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I saw that, but I wanted to dig deeper and read his Email > on why he didn't like it... Until that's resolved, the SS > still exists (though with a caveat) In summary, I don't think that patch should spill outside mod_proxy_ftp. Putting it on the mod_proxy config, and hence involving changes to mod_proxy.h API and ap_mmn, seems like superfluous complexity/bloat. Especially when most mod_proxy users won't be requiring mod_proxy_ftp. But that's not a veto, just a -0. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
