On 01/02/2008 08:57 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > FWIW, STATUS on the 2.x branches is cleaned up in anticipation > of the T&R (there are no open patches for 1.3, afaik). > > If you haven't already, I encourage everyone to 'svn up' and > at least run some prelim tests before I do the actual T&R. > I've been working on getting my old Blade (Sol8) up and > running (something's happened to it since I last booted > it up) and test there (as well as on OS X and SUSE) before > I tag. So it would be useful to get some prelim feedback that > we are ready for a tag if others can test. > >
SuSE 10.2 32 Bit: All litmus tests passed for WebDAV. RedHat AS4 64 Bit: 2.0.x: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/ssl/pr43738.t 4 2 50.00% 2 4 (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 16 tests and 25 subtests skipped. Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 2/2790 subtests failed, 99.93% okay. No regression. 2.2.x: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/ssl/pr43738.t 4 2 50.00% 2 4 9 tests and 18 subtests skipped. Failed 1/80 test scripts, 98.75% okay. 2/2807 subtests failed, 99.93% okay. No regression. Solaris 9: 2.2.x: My perl test kit is incomplete, but as far as I can tell no regressions could be found. Solaris 10: 2.2.x: My perl test kit is incomplete, but as far as I can tell no regressions could be found. But there was a problem with the _default_ setting for a virtual host. I am not sure so far if this is my config or if there is something else going wrong on Solaris 10. I will investigate tomorrow. My Solaris boxes are to0 slow to get test results for both 2.0.x and 2.2.x in time, but given the fact that the changes for 2.0.x are small compared to 2.2.x I only tested 2.2.x. Regards Rüdiger
