On 4/1/08 5:35 AM, "Issac Goldstand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think we're even talking about on-the-fly stuff for the "Lua" > parser engine, so Perl can do everything that Lua can. I am. The biggest problems I have with current system are: -Every module does things differently -No real per-request configuration. Some modules use env to do some of this. -I have to write a good bit of code before a module is configurable. (I'm lazy. Very lazy.) If we do what niq suggests (which, if we stick with current config system is fine) is that it just adds another layer on top of all the existing issues. With lua, for example you could make modules Lua modules... Maybe could do same in perl?? My opinion (which is worthless, I know) is to pick one way and do it. Lua is easy to learn and satisfies most (all?) of our requirements. And if Brian M. and I can learn it, anyone can ;) -- Brian Akins Chief Operations Engineer Turner Digital Media Technologies
