On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 7:41 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sympathize, but this doesn't reflect the addition of <lua> blocks... > those blocks can be trivially implemented as a loadable module ;-)
As I grok it, the point would be throw out our ridiculous config syntax entirely (or at best write a compatibility module or a converter to the new format) and expose a real config API (hello providers! *chuckle*) and then build a pure LUA-based config format on top of that. I'd be definitely curious to see what would come of that - 'cuz really it can't be much worse than the garbage we're stuck with now. -- justin
