On Thursday 29 May 2008, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21137 has > > been in Debian testing and unstable for about 6 months without > > problems. It is not an elegant solution but it works. Considering > > that is is not clear how an elegant solution would look like, > > including this patch might make sense. > > Even if so, we cannot simply put it in 2.2.9. It needs to > be in trunk first, then tested, then proposed for backport > to 2.2.x and then voted on there before backported. Timing-wise, > it is VERY unlikely this will happen in time for 2.2.9. However, > some other prefork fixes I just added to STATUS in hopes of adding > them to 2.2.9...
I will bug you again after 2.2.9, then.
