Nick Kew wrote: > If it's ASL, that means we could just grab it (as could anyone else > whose distribution is ASL-compatible). But I certainly wouldn't > want to do that without the author's clear agreement.
The most recent version of the module, which I released a few days ago, is ASL2.0. In any case, I am also willing to execute a formal software grant as per http://www.apache.org/licenses/ > I think what matters here is to avoid creating a useless fork. > If the original developer is still doing active development on > the module, we should either merge that effort with ours or > leave well alone. In practice, a merge would imply development > moving to this list. > > If David is happy to subscribe to this list and make it his > primary forum for the module, then +1. I have indeed subscribed to this list, and I would much prefer merging the module instead of developing it on my own. -David
