On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:49:35PM +0200, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > > Given that the lifetime of the callbacks is now constrained, is the > > new global pool still needed? > > Where does this patch use a global pool? It keeps a reference on the pconf > pool in a global variable, but it no longer creates a global pool. > Or do I miss your point?
Oh, sorry, I missed that the dynlockpool is now parented off pconf. Ignore me and carry on ;) joe
