On 2010-05-11 at 08:52, Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> to
>>>>
>>>> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>>> LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>>> LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>
>> Any reason not to name the func before the script, especially since path
>> names
>> can get long winded, and I'm thinking C like decl funcname(args) {script}
>
> So we'd have
>
> LuaHook AccessChecker funcname /path/to/script.lua
> <LuaHook AccessChecker funcname>
I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
(defaults to "handle"). I hate having optional arguments that don't
come at the end. I'd just as soon make it a required argument, but if
people would rather it stay optional, then I'd rather leave it at the
end. What do folks prefer?
Dan
