> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 03:51
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64?
>
> On 8/31/2011 4:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > I've attempted to simply substitute the 2.2.19 filter code into the
> > 2.0.64 http_protocol.c sources, and am unsure how far off
> these patches
> > are from what they need to be; there's been a significant
> amount of drift
> > and refactoring in the interim.
>
> Still looking for feedback, but the attached applies and
> corresponds to
> 2.2.20 with the exception of atoi rather than strtoi
> semantics, and without
> the no DefaultType exception..
>
>
>
Thanks for taking care. It applies cleanly, but most byterange tests
from the framework fail:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/apache/byterange.t 136 97 71.32% 2-9 11 16-17 19-20 25-26
28 33-35 37-39 42 44-47
49-61 63-68 70-73 77-79
83-88 90-96 98-99 101-103
105-113 115-123 126-127
130 132-136
t/apache/byterange5.t 5 4 80.00% 1 3-5
t/apache/byterange7.t 13 5 38.46% 2-5 12
This might be because I use a 64 bit build of 2.0.x (no other test environment
at hand
at the moment) and 2.0.x is not really good at 64 bit (lots of compiler
warnings).
Regards
Rüdiger
