On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 9/3/2011 2:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> With this fix, I get no testcase failures and this skippage: > > Bingo, stared at that code for hours, finally realized I had > re-extracted a -2.2 labeled patch instead of correcting the -2.0 > patch... argh!!! > > Will incorporate the past couple of trunk/2.2 corrections and > propose for backport... if accepted we'll post it as the official > apply_to_2.0.64 patch, with or without a .65 tag. Will also suggest > we tag apr 0.9.20 in the coming few days so if anyone wants to work > in any other corrections, do so in the very near term.
Any idea when you will have time/inclination to update the 2.0.64 patch? I expect to have a bit of time to spend either working on the patch or testing it. I can take care of T&R of APR 0.9.20 in a couple of days provided that someone first gets CVE-2011-1928 resolved in that branch.
