On 9/1/2011 2:41 AM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] >> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 03:51 >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64? >> >> On 8/31/2011 4:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >>> I've attempted to simply substitute the 2.2.19 filter code into the >>> 2.0.64 http_protocol.c sources, and am unsure how far off >> these patches >>> are from what they need to be; there's been a significant >> amount of drift >>> and refactoring in the interim. >> >> Still looking for feedback, but the attached applies and >> corresponds to >> 2.2.20 with the exception of atoi rather than strtoi >> semantics, and without >> the no DefaultType exception.. >> >> >> > > Thanks for taking care. It applies cleanly, but most byterange tests > from the framework fail: > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > t/apache/byterange.t 136 97 71.32% 2-9 11 16-17 19-20 25-26 > 28 33-35 37-39 42 44-47 > 49-61 63-68 70-73 77-79 > 83-88 90-96 98-99 101-103 > 105-113 115-123 126-127 > 130 132-136 > t/apache/byterange5.t 5 4 80.00% 1 3-5 > t/apache/byterange7.t 13 5 38.46% 2-5 12 > > This might be because I use a 64 bit build of 2.0.x (no other test > environment at hand > at the moment) and 2.0.x is not really good at 64 bit (lots of compiler > warnings).
Ideally can you provide me the -verbose output (offlist or to your people.a.o/ space if it's lengthy)?
