Is there anyone has tested the 2.2.19 with this patch? 2011/9/1 "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <[email protected]>
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 03:51 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64? > > > > On 8/31/2011 4:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > > > I've attempted to simply substitute the 2.2.19 filter code into the > > > 2.0.64 http_protocol.c sources, and am unsure how far off > > these patches > > > are from what they need to be; there's been a significant > > amount of drift > > > and refactoring in the interim. > > > > Still looking for feedback, but the attached applies and > > corresponds to > > 2.2.20 with the exception of atoi rather than strtoi > > semantics, and without > > the no DefaultType exception.. > > > > > > > > Thanks for taking care. It applies cleanly, but most byterange tests > from the framework fail: > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > t/apache/byterange.t 136 97 71.32% 2-9 11 16-17 19-20 > 25-26 > 28 33-35 37-39 42 44-47 > 49-61 63-68 70-73 77-79 > 83-88 90-96 98-99 > 101-103 > 105-113 115-123 126-127 > 130 132-136 > t/apache/byterange5.t 5 4 80.00% 1 3-5 > t/apache/byterange7.t 13 5 38.46% 2-5 12 > > This might be because I use a 64 bit build of 2.0.x (no other test > environment at hand > at the moment) and 2.0.x is not really good at 64 bit (lots of compiler > warnings). > > > Regards > > Rüdiger >
