I have been trying to build trunk from "trunk" versions of apr and apr-util. buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or apr-UTIL). In any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but UNIX does.
To test what you are testing - should I use apr and apr-util trunks, or is it better "in all thinks" - i.e. including httpd-trunk builds to use the released versions of apr, or their trunk versions. Reading the lists I see many of you are involved in both projects. I just want to be in sync with the ways you test for new releases. Sincerely, Michael On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > On 25 Mar 2012, at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time > > for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose > > the backports based on recent trunk improvements... > > > > Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM. > > +1. > > I've just T&R'ed apr-util v1.4.2, containing some compile time fixes for > static builds. In theory, given no drama it should be ready for April 2nd. > > Regards, > Graham > -- > >
