Jim, I am very happy to hear that and would like to compile some feedback/ideas in the next days. I also want to get some better performance comparison numbers for TLS+http/1 vs. TLS+http/2 in the infamous http2 gopher tiles example, not focussing on page load times but requests/sec.
The module itself has become more and more apr-ified, but there are still many areas to improve and some multi-thread walls I ran into. And I agree that it rather seems core needs some nudges here and there than a rebuilding. But I am far from claiming any expertise in that. Cheers, Stefan PS. As a small quid-pro-quo and because you were asking about a possibly 2.4.13: there has so far not been a volunteer to integrate the ALPN patch I adapted from mod_spdy. It would be great if someone could take a look at it. It is the biggest obstacle so far for experimenters (early sufferers) of mod_h2 and it would be very nice to have it out of the way. > Am 31.03.2015 um 17:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: > > Stefan, > > One thing that was v useful about mod_spdy was the insight on > what changes/re-factoring might be done w/i the core httpd code > itself to make things easier, such as the idea of a "slave" > conn_rec (or a virtual connection). I started trying to fold > some of that into trunk, and so any insight you may have from > your mod_h2 work would be MOST APPRECIATED. I think we can > abstract out enough that we would not need a wholesale re-write > of large chunks of the core. > > I also think that Serf and even APR would also benefit from > that as well. <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
