re: https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/issues/28 has this design further evolved?
Is there a way to make the deep copy un-necessary by injecting your own bucket_alloc created with a pool with a threadsafe allocator very early? It seems like all of the buckets are created in the h2 thread after you've had a chance to manipulate stuff. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > Thanks, Jim! > > > >> Am 31.03.2015 um 19:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: >> >> What I did is used the alpn patch as a guide and updated trunk >> to add the functionality: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/r1670397 >> >> I'll give it a few days to work out and then propose for a >> 2.4 backport. >> >>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I think the old NPN patch is in trunk. The ALPN not AFAIK. I undertstand >>> there is a trunk first policy, but it'd be good to get it at least going >>> there... thanks. >>> >>> Stefan >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 31.03.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: >>> >>>>> >>>>> PS. As a small quid-pro-quo and because you were asking about a possibly >>>>> 2.4.13: there has so far not been a volunteer to integrate the ALPN patch >>>>> I adapted from mod_spdy. It would be great if someone could take a look >>>>> at it. It is the biggest obstacle so far for experimenters (early >>>>> sufferers) of mod_h2 and it would be very nice to have it out of the way. >>>> >>>> I'll take a look. It's not currently in trunk, is that right? >> -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
