On 29 May 2015 at 16:49, Andy Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I honestly wasn't really thinking that closely about it. I do know > this. > > The openssl default install results in the following: > libssl.so.1.0.0 > symlinked to > libssl.so > > however, fedora's system provided libraries look like this: > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Mar 19 12:37 libssl.so.10 -> libssl.so.1.0.1k > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 439572 Mar 19 12:37 libssl.so.1.0.1k > > So depending on how the linker finds the library, this could be kind of a > mess. > > And I no longer have a debian system so wasn't sure how debian's system > installs are.
Debian is the same. And I nevr and any issues compiling against a symlink. Cheers Mario
