> Am 24.06.2015 um 15:26 schrieb Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>: > > I would argue that the copying option above is most dangerous, as this has > side effects that may not be catered for by pool cleanups.
Totally agree. That is why it is not implemented like that. With the side effect that mod_logio, for example, does not aggregate data for the main connection. The only exception in the current implementation is mod_ssl. mod_h2 copies that one to the slave connection, so that ssl_var_lookup() works. > I believe we should be treating the “pseudo” connections as real connections, > and perhaps by linking a “subconnection” to a “connection” (c->main) in the > same way we currently link a subrequest to a request (r->main). Sounds good. Then mod_ssl/mod_logio can treat these as they seem fit. > If you run into any blockers while doing this I would argue those blockers > would be bugs and we want to fix them. Cheers, Stefan <green/>bytes GmbH Hafenweg 16, 48155 Münster, Germany Phone: +49 251 2807760. Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782
