> On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: >> I believe we should be treating the “pseudo” connections as real >> connections, and perhaps by linking a “subconnection” to a “connection” >> (c->main) in the same way we currently link a subrequest to a request >> (r->main). > > There are some basics for this in trunk from jim. I think if the slave > connections had their own bucket_alloc it might remove some of the > copying in h2.
+1... that's the thought at least ;)
