On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 02/15/2018 07:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> It seems like some serious overhead to force a function call >> for each and every access to a struct field, especially if > > I don't see this in the proposal below. _sizeof() and / or _copy would IMHO > only be needed in rare cases and probably > non critical pathes. They could be handy though. > I don't see any kind of _get / _set for each field below.
+1, those sorts of accessors are only interesting when doing something more than changing a member value. E.g. when a major part of the entire structure is rearranged triggered by specific member value changes.
